W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2007

Start of ATAG2.0 Techniques Review - my action item

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:54:15 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20070322091431.014c8148@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Started my review. Seems OK so far..

 From Editors' draft:

Techniques B.1.1-1.1,  B.1.1-2.1, and B.1.1-2.2 - all mention "WCAG" in 
"benchmark document" reference
  (I thought there was an
issue with this as a result of recent joint ATAG-WCAG call)?

Also, for Technique B.1.1-2.1, first sentence, I would say "providing at 
least one content type that has
a 'benchmark document'"  instead of the language currently there (which 
seems awkward to me)?

Technique B.1.1-General.1 - mentions "WCAG" (see previous note)

For Technique B.1.2-1.1, should we say "accessibility information of the 
resulting
content"
rather than just "resulting content"  (if that's what we more precisely mean..)

Will try to continue if I have time..

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

PS - I will be away April 1 - April 6
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 13:06:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:06 GMT