Re: Joint call with WCAG-WG - 11 January 2006

Agreed on F2F. I assume March is earliest we can do it. right?  I am not 
available the week of March 5. 
Will WCAG be "revised" LC by then?  Shouldn't we should delay until WCAG 
reaches this state before we release a LC.

Andi Snow-Weaver was (independently) stating the need for a "partial 
credit" scheme as I have tried several times in the past to get.  I know 
having some hard minimums of support is good for accessibility, but not 
always practical from a tool vendor point of view. 

For example, creating an accessible tool is quite independent from 
creating a tool that makes accessible content.  Achieving either is 
difficult, but getting
no level of compliance with only one of these achieved seems not 
satisfactory. 

PS I have asked for a general review by IBMers (beyond Becky Gibson). That 
will not time out by the stated deadline but should be ready by any F2F.

Barry A. Feigenbaum, Ph. D.
Tool Architect
Human Ability and Accessibility Center - IBM Research
www.ibm.com/able, w3.ibm.com/able 
voice 512-838-4763/tl678-4763
fax 512-838-9367/0330
cell 512-799-9182
feigenba@us.ibm.com
Mailstop 904/5F-021
11400 Burnet Rd., Austin TX 78758

Accessibility ARB Representative on SWG ARB
W3C AUWG Representative
Austin IBM Club BoD
Interface Technologies IDT Member
QSE Development TopGun

Sun Certified Java Programmer, Developer & Architect 
IBM Certified XML Developer; OOAD w/UML

This message sent with 100% recycled electrons



Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca> 
Sent by: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org
01/11/2007 04:21 PM

To
w3c-wai-au@w3.org
cc

Subject
Re: Joint call with WCAG-WG - 11 January 2006







Hi all,

I thought that call went quite well.

At this point, I think the pile of comments is big enough to justify 
another F2F - the goal of which would be a Last Call WD.

Thoughts?

Cheers,
Jan