RE: Starter comments on WCAG 2.0 draft

Did you mean it didn't work for everyone?   

Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 1:11 PM
To: jan.richards@utoronto.ca; w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: RE: Starter comments on WCAG 2.0 draft




----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Jan Richards"<jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
      [3] Validity debate:
    
    COMMENT: My personal view is that validity is probably not "necessary 
    for a minimum level of accessibility" (i.e. a level 1 success criteria 
    item), but perhaps should be retained at a higher level.
    
    Roberto:
If an authoring tool generates xhtml and it's no valid, when served as
application/xhtml+xml some browsers end the page execution: this means no
accessibility for all.