RE: Starter comments on WCAG 2.0 draft

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:10:47 +0200 To: <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> Message-Id: <20050725140800.SM03116@Inbox> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:05 GMT



----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Jan Richards"<jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
      [3] Validity debate:
    
    COMMENT: My personal view is that validity is probably not “necessary 
    for a minimum level of accessibility” (i.e. a level 1 success criteria 
    item), but perhaps should be retained at a higher level.
    
    Roberto:
If an authoring tool generates xhtml and it's no valid, when served as application/xhtml+xml some browsers end the page execution: this means no accessibility for all.