W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: New ATAG Workplan

From: <boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:51:10 -0400
Message-ID: <1095123070.4146407e3cc97@webmail.nist.gov>
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

I will be sending the templates soon (my OLD ITEM)..
I could help possibly with examining the wording of the success criteria..

Quoting Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>:

> 
> New ATAG Workplan (Assigned Sept 13, 2004)
> 
> - Many items still do not have volunteers. Please volunteer on the list.
> - The deadline for all items is the San Francisco Face-to-Face (though 
> earlier completion would be helpful - especially since we are planning 
> to publish a Final Call draft at that time).
> 
> ----
> 
> OLD ITEMS:
> 
> • 3.1.1(10) – Prompting and assisting for Metadata- disguised screenshot
> of TILE – JT/JR, LN
> 
> • “Project Review” from staff contact (MM) to W3C powers (Judy(?), Tim)
> that be explaining our testing challenges – MM. (timeline would be over
> a month) TB volunteers to help.
> 
> • Try to put together set of templates (what questions) that can be
> used a tool - TB
> 
> ----
> 
> Work from the following until a new working draft is prepared:
> http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/guidelines.html
> http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech1.html
> http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech2.html
> http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech3.html
> http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech4.html
> http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/wcagrefs.html
> 
> ----
> 
> NEW ITEMS:
> 
> • Do a more general review of UAAG to see where we do things differently 
> and if that is necessary - especially, examine conformance mechanism in 
> relation to that proposed in UAAG.
> (Jan, Matt)
> 
> • Guidelines - Examine success criteria for completeness and wording, 
> ensure correctness of Glossary
> ()
> 
> • Examine techniques for guideline 1 for gaps.
> ()
> 
> • Finalize reference to ISO16071
> (Roberto)
> 
> • Examine techniques for guideline 2 for gaps.
> ()
> 
> • Examine techniques for guideline 3 for gaps.
> (Jan)
> 
> • Examine techniques for guideline 4 (especially 4.5) for gaps.
> ()
> 
> REVIEWS:
> 
> • Automated reviews of spelling, grammar, broken links
> (Matt)
> 
> • Look for broken document references
> (Jan)
> 
> • Look for broken doc structure
> (Jan and Matt at Editor meeting)
> 
> • Examine figures
> (Jan)
> 
> ---------------------------------
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan
> 
> -- 
> Jan Richards, M.Sc.
> User Interface Design Specialist
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto
> 
>    Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
>    Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
>    Phone: 416-946-7060
>    Fax:   416-971-2896
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 00:51:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:04 GMT