Re: Action item: success criteria

I think Jutta's text hits the nail on the head. I've just made a couple 
of minor edits:

Accessibility prompting must be integrated into any features that assist 
with author decision-making (e.g. templates, wizards and instruction 
text). Accessibility checking, repair and documentation functions must 
occur before completion of the authoring workflow.

Suggestions or comments?

Cheers,
Jan

Jutta Treviranus wrote:

> Here is proposed rewording of Checkpoint 4.3, success criteria 1. 
> Because this refers to timing and workflow, I felt that the previous 
> success criteria did not address the need to time the accessibility 
> functions at the appropriate time in the workflow. Suggestions, comments?
> 
> Jutta
> 
> New wording:
> 
> Accessibility prompting must be integrated into any guidance offered  to 
> the author that assists in making authoring decisions (including 
> templates, wizards and instructive text in dialogs). Accessibility 
> checking, repair and documentation functions must occur before 
> completion of the authoring workflow.
> 
> 
> 
> Old Wording:
> 
> *Accessibility prompting, checking, and repair functions and 
> documentations/ must/ occur before completion of authoring workflow. 
> [@@note to us: this allows accessibility checking to be the last step in 
> workflow, if necessary@@][@@wording is still flexible@@] [@@maybe we can 
> allow authoring to define scope of workflow with input from author@@]*
> *
> *

-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896

Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 13:40:44 UTC