W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: Success criteria proposal for ATAG 2.0 1.1 and 1.2

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:14:45 -0400
Message-ID: <1089702885.40f38be54e277@webmail.utoronto.ca>
To: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Hi Roberto,

Thanks for pointing out my error! That should have read:

Proposal is to modify ATAG 2.0 success criteria 1.1 and 1.2 as follows:

Success criteria for 1.1:

1. Authoring tool interfaces that are also Web content must conform to 
[WCAG].
2. Authoring tool interfaces that not are also Web content must conform
to [ISO16071].

Success criteria for 1.2:

1. In authoring tool interfaces that are also Web content, at least one
editing method must conform to [WCAG] for each element and object
property that is editable by the tool.
2. In authoring tool interfaces that not are also Web content, At least
one editing method must conform to [ISO16071] for each element and object 
property that is editable by the tool.

-- 
Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist 
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto 

  Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca 
  Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
  Phone: 416-946-7060 
  Fax:   416-971-2896


Quoting "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>:

> 
> Sorry, but must'n be :
> 1. Conform to wcag
> 2. Conform to ISO16071
> 
>   1. Authoring tool interfaces that are also Web content must conform to
> WCAG
> 
> Authoring tool interfaces that not are also Web content must conform to
> ISO16071
> 
> How can we ask to conform to WEB CONTENT guidelines to Authoring tool
> interfaces that not are web content?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Messaggio originale -----
>     Da: "Jan Richards"<jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
>     Inviato: 12/07/04 18.28.43
>     A: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org"<w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
>     Oggetto: Success criteria proposal for ATAG 2.0 1.1 and 1.2
>     
>     
>     Proposal is to modify ATAG 2.0 success criteria 1.1 and 1.2 as follows:
>     
>     Success criteria for 1.1:
>     
>     1. Authoring tool interfaces that are also Web content must conform to 
>     [ISO16071].
>     2. Authoring tool interfaces that not are also Web content must conform
> to 
>     WCAG.
>     
>     Success criteria for 1.2:
>     
>     1. In authoring tool interfaces that are also Web content, at least one
> 
>     editing method must conform to [ISO16071] for each element and object
> property 
>     that is editable by the tool.
>     2. In authoring tool interfaces that not are also Web content, At least
> one 
>     editing method must conform to WCAG for each element and object property
> that 
>     is editable by the tool.
>     
>     Comments?
>     -Jan
>     
>     -- 
>     Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist 
>     Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto 
>     
>       Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca 
>       Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
>       Phone: 416-946-7060 
>       Fax:   416-971-2896
>     
>     
>     Quoting Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>:
>     
>     > Attached.
>     > 
>     > Cheers,
>     > Jan
>     > 
>     > 
>     > Quoting Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>:
>     > 
>     > > 
>     > > We have joined the telecronference as of 9am ET today. The meeting
> will 
>     > > continue until 6pm, when we have a joint telecon with the WCAG WG.
>     > > 
>     > > +1-617-761-6200, code 2894#
>     > > 
>     > > -
>     > > m
>     > > 
>     > > 
>     > 
>     
>     
>     
> 
> [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare
> la restante parte.]
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 04:12:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:03 GMT