W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: AUWG Meeting Reminder (December 15, 4pm-5pm ET)

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:44:30 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20031212113901.00b1c768@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
I may not be able to make it to this telecon, because of a conflicting 
meeting.   For my action
item (3 below), I have done some preliminary mappings, which are in the 
attached files.   Is this what you
wanted?  If not, let me know and I will revise.

Best wishes, Tim Boland NIST



  At 11:08 AM 12/12/2003 -0500, you wrote:


>Hi Everyone,
>
>Just a reminder that the AUWG conference call will take place
>on Monday December 15 at the regular time.:
>    4:00 pm ET
>    (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
>
>---
>
>AGENDA:
>
>(1) Face to face meeting planning
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2003OctDec/0056.html
>
>(2) Proposed changes to draft of the ATAG References to WCAG
>http://www.w3.org/mid/3FCB6334.67CA794@utoronto.ca
>See below.
>
>(3) Guideline 1 and ISO 16071 vs IBM
>http://www.w3.org/mid/OF1B2A0516.91381C61-ON86256DF8.007B1BF1-86256DF8.00838081@us.ibm.com
>
>(4) Review of Work items: (see below)
>
>(5) Other
>
>---
>
>Technique Work Items
>
>(1) - Update techniques for guideline 1 (consider how 1.1 should be
>organized if either the IBM software guidelines or the ISO document are
>adopted, review the rest, asking what needs to be dropped or added?)
>=> TIM
>
>(2) - Update techniques for guideline 2 (review all checkpoints, asking
>what needs to be dropped or added?)
>=> LIDDY
>
>(3) - Update techniques for guideline 3 (review reliance on WCAG
>numbering in 3.1, review the rest, asking what needs to be dropped or
>added?)
>=> JAN
>
>(4) - Update techniques for guideline 4 (add techniques for 4.2 (4.3,
>a.k.a 4.X still does not have success criteria yet), review 4.1 and 4.4,
>asking what needs to be dropped or added?)
>=>GREG
>
>(5) - Take a wide of the document. Is it well structured? Is it easy to
>use? What is missing?
>=>KAREN
>
>(6) - Update the references (Go through the document and adding or
>correcting references as necessary, update and repair the references
>page)
>=> GREG
>
>(7) - Maintain the glossary (Ensure terms are up to date, keep
>synchronized with glossary in guidelines, both glossaries need to
>develop with an eye on other WAI and W3C glossaries)
>=> KAREN
>
>
>--
>
>


Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 11:45:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:48 UTC