W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: AU minutes from 11 Feb call

From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:15:21 -0600
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org, jbrewer@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF22ED5BCF.F3666B4B-ON86256B5D.0083511E@raleigh.ibm.com >
So was there any action items from the call other than the agenda for the
face to face? None were listed but seemed that one or more were alluded to:

1.  Is more from AUWG needed for EOWG to point to or not?

2.  Is EOWG & JB going to include more software/tools in policy materials
or not?

And a question about the discussion:
Who's strategy [WAI?, EO?, AU?, W3C?] is it not to mention commercial
products?  Vendor neutral doesn't have to mean no vendors does it? Does
market neutral [1] mean only mentioning free products?

[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/#organization

Regards,
Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able

Hi all,

Here are the minutes from today's call:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2002/minutes/minutes11feb2002.html

- Jan
Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 19:15:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:47 UTC