- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:52:33 -0000
- To: charles@w3.org
- Cc: pjenkins@us.ibm.com, Liddy.Nevile@motile.net, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Charles wrote: > lang is an attribute defined for a particular language. xml:lang is > predefined for all xml languages. So normally if you want to > do something to > have an attribute that describes the natural language content > of its host > element, xml:lang would be the smart way to go. Near as damn it equivalent then? With xml:lang as a more 'standard' way of specifying which language is in use? Thanks Charles. Regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to find out all about it.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 02:51:00 UTC