Now, maybe we are getting somewhere. I have: Programming Tools: Set 5 (Jan - new ones) = Increased color saturation background. Document Tools: Set 5 (Jan new ones) = Increased color saturation background. Conversion tools: set 1s (charles) = Tried to clean up this icon, but is just too complex for the 16x16 space, so I'm proposing another design. Content management tools: set 1s (charles) = Cleaned up this icon and brought it into line with the style of the first two. Multimedia editor: Set 4s (Emmanuelle) = Given this icon a graphic background. Does this bring us closer to agreement? Maybe I'm spending too much time on this, but I really think that, given the important role of these icons all the way through the document, the appearance of these icons will be a major determinant in how seriously people perceive the document. - Jan Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Yep, I would like the dominant colours to be more saturated. > > Anyway, I had a better look at them on the icon table and example pages, and > I think I would like the following: > > Programming Tools: Set 5 (Jan - new ones) > DOcument Tools: Set 5 (Jan new ones) > Conversion tools: set 1s (charles) > Content management tools: set 1s (charles) > Multimedia editor: Set 4s (Emmanuelle)
(image/gif attachment: conv-tools2.gif)
(image/gif attachment: manage-tools2.gif)
(image/gif attachment: prog-tools2.gif)
(image/gif attachment: mm-tools2.gif)
(image/gif attachment: content-tools2.gif)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:00 GMT