W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: AU Techniques: Icons

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:45:24 -0500 (EST)
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0112061242100.16737-100000@tux.w3.org>
Yep, I would like the dominant colours to be more saturated.

Anyway, I had a better look at them on the icon table and example pages, and
I think I would like the following:

Programming Tools: Set 5 (Jan - new ones)
DOcument Tools: Set 5 (Jan new ones)
Conversion tools: set 1s (charles)
Content management tools: set 1s (charles)
Multimedia editor: Set 4s (Emmanuelle)

I think it should be noted in the document that there are other icons
availabe and the group would appreciate feedback if there is a preferred set.

chaals

On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Jan Richards wrote:

  > I end up still voting for mine. The objections I have to these are as
  > follows:
  >
  > The colours should be higher contrast - I actually couldn't really tell what
  > the backgrounds were.

  What do you mean by "contrast"? There is a very high contrast between
  the background and the black detailing. If you mean you'd like the
  background colours to be slightly more saturated, fine by me.

  > If they get reduced they rapidly become indistiguishable.

  Why would they ever be reduced? They are already 16x16.
  It is the large icons that suffer quality reduction when they are
  displayed at 16x16.



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2001 12:45:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:46 UTC