W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Name for working draft

From: Marjolein Katsma <access@javawoman.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 21:21:20 +0200
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010525212002.03c73dd8@pop.javawoman.com>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I like a name rather than a number in this case. How about a mythical animal? I propose Phoenix :)

(Or is that controversial again?)

At 14:29 2001-05-25 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>Bit more background - there are perception problems with a number, in that if
>we say 1.1 then I don't think it conveys the fact that this is more or less
>our expected 2.0 draft, and if we say 1.9 then people will wonder what
>happened to 1.1 through 1.8. So the easiest thing is to have a name, hence
>"wombat" as a proposal. (Because animals are relatively uncontroversial).

Marjolein Katsma
HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/
Bookstore for Webmasters - http://hshelp.com/bookstore/bookstore.html
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 15:21:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:00 GMT