- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:20:42 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Marjolein Katsma <access@javawoman.com>
- cc: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Well, I am not really fussed. But since I want to get it out I am planning to stick with wombat unless anyone actually objects... (but now I want to think of something to call phoenix. And I still like Sarah as a name, too, but I guess another day...) cheers Chaals On Fri, 25 May 2001, Marjolein Katsma wrote: I like a name rather than a number in this case. How about a mythical animal? I propose Phoenix :) (Or is that controversial again?) At 14:29 2001-05-25 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Bit more background - there are perception problems with a number, in that if >we say 1.1 then I don't think it conveys the fact that this is more or less >our expected 2.0 draft, and if we say 1.9 then people will wonder what >happened to 1.1 through 1.8. So the easiest thing is to have a name, hence >"wombat" as a proposal. (Because animals are relatively uncontroversial). Marjolein Katsma HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/ Bookstore for Webmasters - http://hshelp.com/bookstore/bookstore.html -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 16:23:51 UTC