W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Name for working draft

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:20:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: Marjolein Katsma <access@javawoman.com>
cc: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105251619520.8604-100000@tux.w3.org>
Well, I am not really fussed. But since I want to get it out I am planning to
stick with wombat unless anyone actually objects...

(but now I want to think of something to call phoenix. And I still like Sarah
as a name, too, but I guess another day...)



On Fri, 25 May 2001, Marjolein Katsma wrote:

  I like a name rather than a number in this case. How about a mythical animal? I propose Phoenix :)

  (Or is that controversial again?)

  At 14:29 2001-05-25 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >Bit more background - there are perception problems with a number, in that if
  >we say 1.1 then I don't think it conveys the fact that this is more or less
  >our expected 2.0 draft, and if we say 1.9 then people will wonder what
  >happened to 1.1 through 1.8. So the easiest thing is to have a name, hence
  >"wombat" as a proposal. (Because animals are relatively uncontroversial).

  Marjolein Katsma
  HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/
  Bookstore for Webmasters - http://hshelp.com/bookstore/bookstore.html

Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 16:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:46 UTC