W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: ATAG PR: improving RP definition

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 08:10:22 -0600
To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, "'Jutta Treviranus'" <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Cc: "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <unagi69@concentric.net>, "'Authoring Tools Guidelines List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000701bf2605$2ca89180$df2cfea9@gregg>
Sounds like a good idea to me too.

Gregg

(Gregory, we should talk again on this.    We're still at P3, but I always
like to recheck and discuss to make sure we/re not missing something when
two sets of good heads come up with different answers.   Make sure we both
are looking at same information with same rulers.)

-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Human Factors
Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
Director - Trace R & D Center
Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/
FAX 608/262-8848
For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org]  On
Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
Sent:	Tuesday, November 02, 1999 4:01 PM
To:	Jutta Treviranus
Cc:	Gregory J. Rosmaita; Authoring Tools Guidelines List
Subject:	Re: ATAG PR: improving RP definition

Yes.

I think we had in fact decided we would like to (I know I had).

Charles


On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jutta Treviranus wrote:

  I have no objections to changing the example used.

  Jutta

  At 1:59 PM -0500 11/2/99, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:
  >aloha, charles!
  >
  >as long as you are contemplating a change in the wording of the
explanation of
  >Relative Priority, please reconsider the use of ACRONYM and ABBR as your
P3
  >example...
  >
  >as documented in my exchange with phil jenkins on the w3c-wai-au list, in
  >posts
  >archived at:
  >
  >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0092.html
  >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0093.html
  >and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0096.html
  >
  >i am adamantly opposed to the use of ACRONYM and ABBR in the Relative
Priority
  >example, as they are far more important to accessibility (and
  >interoperability)
  >than the P3 accorded them by WCAG...
  >
  >yes, i know that WCAG as it stands today does accord the use of ACRONYM
and
  >ABBR a P3, but there has been much debate on several WAI lists as to the
  >importance of the use of ACRONYM and ABBR (as well as their expansion
slash
  >exposition to user agents), and it would, therefore, behoove us to use a
less
  >controversial example, several of which are provided in the posts cited
  >above...
  >
  >gregory.
  >--------------------------------------------------------
  >He that lives on Hope, dies farting
  >     -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
  >--------------------------------------------------------
  >Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
  >   WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC
  >        <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html>
  >--------------------------------------------------------


--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 1999 09:10:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:43 UTC