W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: New draft - please review

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:52:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, love26@gorge.net, "Rosmaita, Gregory J." <unagi69@concentric.net>, au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910190051200.3698-100000@tux.w3.org>
Maybe what we should do is put something in the guidelines document to make
it very clear that the techniques include relevant refrences (not just UA
guidelines - there are others which are equally important)


On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Kynn Bartlett wrote:

  At 11:12 AM 10/18/1999 , Ian Jacobs wrote:
  >That seems like overkill to me. Can you just point to the UA checklist?
  Probably, except that when we have something that people are calling
  crucial information, it seems like we should make sure that it's
  not simply lost in a crossreference.  If the checkpoints of the
  UA checklist are considered _as important_ as the checkpoints in
  the AU checklist, for purposes of AU conformity, then we should 
  list both in the same place.  Otherwise we risk loss of signal via
  unfollowed hyperlinks.
  Kynn Bartlett                                    mailto:kynn@hwg.org
  President, HTML Writers Guild                    http://www.hwg.org/
  AWARE Center Director                          http://aware.hwg.org/

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 1999 00:52:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:43 UTC