Re: importing and converting markup

I like this wording. I would still be inclined to say "accessibility features
of content" (as per Eric's suggestion).

Charles McCN

On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:

  I definitely support combing the two checkpoints, and offer a proposed
  rewording to clarify a couple issues.
  
  How about:
  Preserve accessible content during conversions or transformations. 
  
  The issue that I am trying to clarify is that a tool might make
  transformations either while importing or exporting. I interpretted
  Charles' proposal to only address exports.  I'm not sure that my proposal
  makes it any more clear.  
  
  I deleted the explicit mention of types of conversions/transformations to
  leave it open to all types.  I don't feel strongly about leaving them out.  
  
  --wendy