W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Handling Massive Proposed Changes

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 15:06:12 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990521150612.00f5bb50@mail.idyllmtn.com>
To: ehansen@ets.org
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
At 03:00 PM 5/19/1999 -0400, eric hansen wrote:
>I would like to suggest a procedure that will help streamline disposition 
>of massive amounts of proposed changes, such as those documented in my 
>revisions of the 30 April 1999 draft.

To be honest, your proposals tend to be so huge and sweeping that
it's hard for me to get my mind around them and take the hours
that would be necessary with a copy of your rewrites, the original,
and your email on the subject in order to figure out what's going
on in there.  I feel when reading these that it might be better to
address each topic (or group of related topics) in a separate
thread in order to get better concensus rather than dumping a
straight list of changes to the WG.

I admit that I have a tendency to get lost in large lists of
suggestions and can deal better with "here's what I think we should
do about <issue>" style of discussion.  Am I the only one?


--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@hwg.org>
President, Governing Board Member
HTML Writers Guild <URL:http://www.hwg.org>
Director, Accessible Web Authoring Resources and Education Center
  <URL:http://aware.hwg.org/>
Received on Friday, 21 May 1999 18:10:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:42 UTC