W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: section 2.5 - charles' proposal and Jan's proposal

From: Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:05:50 -0500
Message-Id: <199904221707.MAA18476@trace.wisc.edu>
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
the issue that I was trying to raise with my previous e-mail is if the
authoring tool modifies invalid or inaccesible markup, server-side
directives and other "place holders" might be considered invalid or
inaccessible and therefore removed.  Thus potentially causing a problem for
authors who are not markup language savvy.  
--wendy

At 09:59 AM 4/22/99 , you wrote:
>WC:: "...place-holding elements that are not defined anywhere fit into
>the picture?"
>
>WL: Although this is an important point it is difficult to imagine it
>being addressed in an authoring tool, it's sort of like the illegitimate
>ALT="text" problem in that the tool that could recognize that "insert
>description here" is different from "picture of my dog, Shea" would make
>us all obsolete.  Trying to force the templates to spot unmodified
>place-holders is a nice idea but...  E.g., in HotDog when you try to
>save a templated file without replacing "enter title here" you get a
>gentle nudge (after all the title of your web site could be "enter title
>here"!) but of course not all template makers are going to furnish such
>facilities.
>
>
>-- 
>Love.
>            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
>http://dicomp.pair.com
> 
Received on Thursday, 22 April 1999 13:07:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:52:54 GMT