Re: Procedural matter

To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Procedural matter
From: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM (Jon Bosak)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 08:59:51 -0700
From w3c-sgml-wg-request@www10.w3.org Fri Sep 13 12: 01:40 1996
In-reply-to: <2.2.32.19960913152836.00767f94@pop.intergate.bc.ca> (message from Tim Bray on Fri, 13 Sep 1996 08:28:36 -0700)

[Tim:]

| I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm seeing at least two copies
| of just about every posting to this list.  It's not *that* much
| trouble to take a couple of seconds and fiddle with the "To" and "Cc"
| fields of whatever mailer you use so you just send one copy, to
| w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org.

I completely agree, but this does mean that we will have to be careful
about attributing quotations.  Some of us who don't use an auto-naming
feature have been relying on the "To" line to indicate whom we were
responding to.

Jon

References:

Procedural matter

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

Prev: Re: XML character sets: a proposal
Next: Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
Index: Message index of w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org mailing list