Re: short-tag considered unhealthy

To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
From: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM (Jon Bosak)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 08:56:37 -0700
From w3c-sgml-wg-request@www10.w3.org Fri Sep 13 11: 58:36 1996
In-reply-to: <199609131531.LAA18377@www10.w3.org> (message from Michael Sperberg-McQueen on Fri, 13 Sep 96 10:23:35 CDT)

[Michael:]

| The posts on HTML discussion groups in which users try to explain to
| each other the meaning of constructs like <OL compact> have convinced
| me, at least, that requiring all attribute value specifications to
| take the form attribute-name, value-indicator, quoted-string would
| result in much less confusion and would be a net gain for everyone
| concerned.

Including the Desperate Perl Hacker Facing a Deadline.

(I am taking on the role of spokesman for this constituency.)

Jon

References:

Re: short-tag considered unhealthy

From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>

Prev: Re: Procedural matter
Next: Re: RS/RE
Index: Message index of w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org mailing list