W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > May 1997

Re: Conformance + an apology

From: Sam Hunting <sgmlsh@CAM.ORG>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 21:49:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Digitome Ltd." <digitome@iol.ie>
cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.94.970527214605.10265A-100000@Stratus.CAM.ORG>

> In the months and years ahead, many products will claim XML
> parsing capabilities. How will such claims be gauged?


Especially, how will such claims be gauged when one is contractually
obligated to provide such a capability? 

Or when one is contractually obligated to convert data which is claimed to
be XML?

Sam Hunting

Received on Tuesday, 27 May 1997 21:49:41 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Murata Makoto: "Comments on Part 1: Asian characters"
Previous message: Murata Makoto: "Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts"
In reply to: Digitome Ltd.: "Conformance + an apology"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:35 EDT