W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > May 1997

Conformance + an apology

From: Digitome Ltd. <digitome@iol.ie>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 08:49:20 +0100
Message-Id: <199705270813.JAA15975@mail.iol.ie>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Firstly, apologies to Mr. Bullard and Mr. Quin for misattibution
in a recent post.

With regard to that posting can anyone confirm or deny that
a RAST/Grove/extended ESIS description of a parsed XML doc
is desrable for parser dev. / conformance testing?

NXP and Lark parse XML. Do they produce the same result? How is
this known?

In the months and years ahead, many products will claim XML
parsing capabilities. How will such claims be gauged?
Sean Mc Grath

Digitome Electronic Publishing
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 1997 04:13:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:26 UTC