Dan Connolly wrote: > > It's not like large complex documents are a square peg and > XML is a round hole, but the folks with those large documents > should be prepared to shave off the corners a bit. i've no gripe with the PEs being there. that is for the implementors to wrestle with. my stance still is that for the first round we encourage simple dtd designs. i know that for those who have complex dtds that is a stone cold hassle, but why don't we give it a trial and see how people react. again, in or out, i am sanguine, but a simpler first round seems prudent. so i have to agree with dan on this. after a long time of watching dtds, with reasonable certainty we can expect them to complexify. lenReceived on Thursday, 3 July 1997 19:44:50 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:46 EDT