At 12:56 PM 1/30/97, lee@sq.com wrote: >There are two <P> elements here that are not closed. This is not well formed. >It is not valid SGML either, unless SERVER has a CDATA content model or >unless < is no longer MDO :-) MDO is normally "<!"; I presume you mean STAGO. But then the real markup wouldn't be right. So let's conclude that the spurious "<P>"s should have been protected. That's why we've made < automatically available, isn't it? Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@acm.orgReceived on Thursday, 30 January 1997 15:45:55 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:57 EDT