w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from January 1997 by author

Alex Milowski

• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Wednesday, 15 January)

Christopher R. Maden

• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Changed comment syntax (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Tuesday, 14 January)

Dan Connolly

• Re: List configuration (Wednesday, 8 January)

Dave Hollander

• Taxonomy List (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Base (Tuesday, 21 January)

Dave Peterson

• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 14 January)

David Durand

• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 30 January)

David G. Durand

• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• XML linking (my draft comments) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: What's a Referrer? (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: TEI xptrs as URLs? (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Entity Ignorance (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: something completely different (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Base (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Base (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (3 CCs deleted) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Wednesday, 22 January)
• proposal process replies (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• proposal process (Tuesday, 21 January)
• (my last word on) Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Some XML syntax/semantic thoughts (PI and RMD) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (2 ccs deleted) (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: BOS as a term (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 CCs deleted). (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 CCs deleted). (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (3 CC's deleted) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: List configuration (2 more CC's deleted) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (3 cc's deleted from two headers) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 9 January)
• (Final?) new term: "XML BOS" (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Wednesday, 8 January)
• List configuration (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re:Can we be more concrete... (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Thursday, 2 January)

Deborah A. Lapeyre

• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Wednesday, 15 January)

Derek Denny-Brown

• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (3 CC's deleted) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Saturday, 4 January)

Digitome Ltd.

• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Taxonomy, Link Relationships - where does it all fit? (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Ephemeral XML? (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: XML-Link (Tuesday, 7 January)
• XML-Link (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Sunday, 5 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Sunday, 5 January)
• Re:Can we be more concrete... (Thursday, 2 January)

Eduardo Gutentag

• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)

Eve L. Maler

• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Friday, 24 January)

Gavin Nicol

• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Entity Ignorance (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: TEI xptrs as URLs? (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: TEI xptrs as URLs? (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Slight change to XMLDecl productions... (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Slight change to XMLDecl productions... (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Production 64 in the November spec. (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed) (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Addressing.... (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Two requests (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Thursday, 2 January)

James Clark

• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 14 January)

Jean Paoli

• RE: Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...) (Monday, 27 January)

Joe English

• Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: XML-Link (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Thursday, 2 January)

John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu

• Re: What's a Referrer? (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Wednesday, 15 January)

Jon Bosak

• text/xml volunteers needed (Saturday, 1 February)
• XML catalog draft (Saturday, 1 February)
• Subject headings (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: 'XML browser' (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: XML for beginners (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...) (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Taxonomy, Link Relationships - where does it all fit? (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: something completely different (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Status of XML-LINK strawman (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Breathing together (Was: Re: Multi-headed indirect links) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: proposal process (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Archives updated (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: # or ? in URLS (was BOS confusion) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: List configuration (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Radical cure for BOS confusion (Monday, 6 January)
• New members; archives updated (Friday, 3 January)
• Charter amendment: hypertext experts (Thursday, 2 January)
• XML Phase II co-editors (Thursday, 2 January)

lee@sq.com

• Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: 1.a: Use Elements? (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Sample Question is irrelevant (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Entity Ignorance (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Wednesday, 29 January)
• RE: Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...) (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available (Monday, 27 January)
• name for xml-link (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Base (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Base (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Non-HTML URL Examples (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Saturday, 18 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Saturday, 18 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links [HoTMetaL edit URL dialogue!] (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: BOS as a term (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Friday, 10 January)

Len Bullard

• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: 'XML browser' (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...) (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Taxonomy, Link Relationships - where does it all fit? (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Taxonomy List (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Breathing together (Was: Re: Multi-headed indirect links) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: proposal process (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: proposal process (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Non-HTML URL Examples (Monday, 20 January)
• Non-HTML URL Examples (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted) (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)

Lou Burnard

• something completely different (Friday, 24 January)

Martin Bryan

• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Using Java to identify link types (Saturday, 25 January)
• Using Java to identify link types (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: (my last word on) Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (2 ccs deleted) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: (Final?) new term: "XML BOS" (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: XML-Link (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Saturday, 4 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict) (Wednesday, 1 January)

Michael Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Base (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Problems with WD-xml-961114 (productions) (Tuesday, 7 January)

Murata Makoto

• Re: Slight change to XMLDecl productions... (Sunday, 19 January)

Murray Altheim

• Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Wednesday, 15 January)

Norbert H. MIKULA

• NXP - Preview (Monday, 13 January)

papresco

• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Sunday, 5 January)

Paul Grosso

• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Wednesday, 15 January)
• questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Monday, 13 January)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Link Indirection (Sunday, 5 January)

Peter Flynn

• XML FAQ (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: XML for beginners (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: XML for beginners (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship types (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: (my last word on) Permitting non-indirect links (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: DTDless instances (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: List configuration (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: List configuration (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Link indirection (Sunday, 5 January)
• Re: Link indirection (Saturday, 4 January)
• Link indirection (Saturday, 4 January)

Peter Murray-Rust

• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Thursday, 30 January)
• 'XML browser' (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available (Tuesday, 28 January)
• XML for beginners (Friday, 24 January)

Pierre G. Richard

• Production 21 (and others) (Saturday, 25 January)

Ralph Ferris

• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Addressing.... (Wednesday, 8 January)

Rick Jelliffe

• Off topic (Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets) (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Thursday, 16 January)

Steven J. DeRose

• HyTime and TEI location ladder examples (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Permitting non-indirect links (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Monday, 6 January)

Steven R. Newcomb

• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Thursday, 2 January)
• [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Wednesday, 1 January)

Terry Allen

• Re: Entity Ignorance (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Entity Ignorance (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Entity and Element Addressing (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: TEI xptrs as URLs? (Tuesday, 28 January)
• What's a Referrer? (Tuesday, 28 January)
• TEI xptrs as URLs? (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Extended Link Groups and Link Chaining (Monday, 27 January)
• xmllink conformance (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Base (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 CCs deleted). (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed) (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: # or ? in URLS (was BOS confusion) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)

Tim Bray

• Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology (Friday, 31 January)
• New XML-Link draft with revised terminology (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) (Friday, 31 January)
• Section 0: Naming (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal? (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.4 d: Address terminology (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete? (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.1.a Formatting Issues Out of Scope? (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.b: Excluded relationships (Friday, 31 January)
• 1.a: Use Elements? (Friday, 31 January)
• ERB publishes discussion framework and vote schedule for XML-Link (Friday, 31 January)
• Redirect (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Entity Ignorance (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Entity and Element Addressing (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: name for xml-link (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: xmllink conformance (Monday, 27 January)
• Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Base (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: proposal process (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Changed comment syntax (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Changed comment syntax (Wednesday, 15 January)
• back to XML: The "You Babe" problem (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Announcing Lark, an XML Processor (Monday, 6 January)

W. Eliot Kimber

• Re: Sample Question (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Sample Question (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Production 21 (and others) (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Base (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Thursday, 23 January)
• Relationship Taxonomy Questions (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Multi-headed indirect links (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Saturday, 18 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Permitting non-indirect links (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Ephemeral XML? (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (3 cc's deleted from two headers) (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: # or ? in URLS (was BOS confusion) (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: XML-Link (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: XML-Link (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Monday, 6 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Sunday, 5 January)
• Re:Link Indirection (Sunday, 5 January)
• Re: Link indirection (Saturday, 4 January)
• Re: Link indirection (Saturday, 4 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Saturday, 4 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Saturday, 4 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)] (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: My House of Sticks XML Link Proposal (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: My House of Sticks XML Link Proposal (Friday, 3 January)
• My House of Sticks XML Link Proposal (Friday, 3 January)
• XML Link Sticks Proposal (Thursday, 2 January)

Last message date: Friday, 31 January 1997 23:19:44 UTC