W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > January 1997

Re: Anchor terminology

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 15:59:54 -0800
Message-Id: <199701292359.PAA27454@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM

| My personal vote goes to this syncretic list from other people's
| suggestions:
| 
| link: bag of pointy bits.
| pointer: a pointy bit with a suit on (so it looks more formal)
| referent: Something you get to via a pointy bit

Even though "referents" sounds exactly like "reference"?

Jon

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 1997 19:00:13 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Durand: "Re: Anchor terminology"
Previous message: David G. Durand: "XML linking (my draft comments)"
In reply to: David G. Durand: "Re: Anchor terminology"
Next in thread: David Durand: "Re: Anchor terminology"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:57 EDT