W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > January 1997

Re: Anchor terminology

From: <lee@sq.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 97 21:48:39 EST
Message-Id: <9701290248.AA09556@sqrex.sq.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org

Peter Flynn said:

> Personally I'd like to avoid the use of the word "anchor" altogether,
> in documenting or publicising XML: it simply is not easily explainable
> to the author or user.

How about:
    Anchors (in the mere mortal non-HyTime sense) are active regions in
    documents.

Lee

Received on Tuesday, 28 January 1997 21:49:12 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Sperberg-McQueen: "Re: Production 21 (and others)"
Previous message: Terry Allen: "Entity and Element Addressing"
Maybe in reply to: Jon Bosak: "Anchor terminology"
Next in thread: David G. Durand: "Re: Anchor terminology"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:56 EDT