>| >How may TEI extended pointers be expressed as URLs? >| >| We've already shown some different possible syntaxes... >| one with TEI pointers as fragment specifiers and the other >| with the pointer as part of the URL itself (David >| and I had a length debate about these recently!!). > >I think one and only one syntax should be chosen (preferrably by >the TEI folks rather than the SERB). I think both *type* have a place. Fragment ID's can be used for client-side sub-document addressing, and URL addressing can used to identify objects at a finer granularity than entities/documents. They could share a common syntax, I agree.Received on Tuesday, 28 January 1997 15:04:25 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:56 EDT