W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > January 1997

Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions

From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 10:47:53 -0600
Message-ID: <32E8E7B9.26B6@hiwaay.net>
To: Terry Allen <tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com>
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM, w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
Terry Allen wrote:
> 
> Agree completely on the below  - Terry

Aye here as well.  This is good requirements list.

len

[Jon Bosak]

> I think that we're in complete agreement on this part.
> 
> When I send you XML data ("you" being a human, a browser application,
> or a nonbrowser application), I want to be able to:
> 
> 1. Specify the behavior without telling you what I mean, or
> 
> 2. Say what I mean and let you figure out what to do with it, or
> 
> 3. Specify the behavior and tell you what I mean, but require that you
> follow the specified behavior regardless of what you think about it,
> or
> 
> 4. Specify the behavior and tell you what I mean and let you make up
> your own mind about whether to follow the specified behavior.
> 
> As the content provider, I want all of these options.
> 
> Note that what I have just said applies to both the linking and the
> non-linking parts of the document and for the same reasons.
> 
> Jon
Received on Friday, 24 January 1997 11:59:02 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:56 EDT