At 01:42 PM 11/28/96 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: >At 04:16 PM 28/11/96 EST, lee@sq.com wrote: >>We do have to get the same whitespace >>behaviour with and without a DTD, so > >Why? - Tim On the other hand, if we have the option of changing SGML (slightly!) so that we can, Why Not? I would vote for a syntactic distinction between element content and mixed contents *in instances* so that DTD and DTD-less parsers can get the same parse in this regard. Paul PrescodReceived on Friday, 29 November 1996 18:16:47 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:44 EDT