W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > November 1996

Re: FPI's in NOTATION declarations

From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 18:18:57 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: dgd@cs.bu.edu (David G. Durand), w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 02:05 PM 11/29/96 -0500, David G. Durand wrote:
>add a new suggestion, that by allowing a _list_ of URIs in the SYSTEM ID,
>we can have all the advantages of PUBLIC, without the drawback of the new
>syntax. (I don't know what this drawback is, but some people obviously feel
>that there is one).]

I think that the idea of allowing multiple URIs in a reference is a good
one. It provides a fallback for network failure.

But I also think that we should keep the SGML public identifier syntax that
hundreds of products and systems already support.

 Paul Prescod
Received on Friday, 29 November 1996 18:16:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:20 UTC