<tbray@textuality.com> (Tim Bray) recently wrote: >Sign me up as also not getting what Charles is driving at here. >...it would be surprising for the to document stay unchanged between two runs >of the parser;.... I can't speak for Charles, but I interpret that part of 8879 to mean that a text entity referenced twice in the same document should give the same replacement text for both references during the same parse. This sounds reasonable--so that one wouldn't have to keep re-downloading the same entity every time it is referenced. I recommend this much "staticness" is text entities. I think SDATA is the appropriate place for funny tricks. Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@acm.orgReceived on Tuesday, 5 November 1996 16:40:28 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:41 EDT