W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > December 1996

Re: Anchors Aweigh

From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
Date: 29 Dec 1996 19:45:17 +0000 (GMT)
To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
Message-id: <199612291945.TAA00576@curia.ucc.ie>
Len BUllard wrote:

   So far, this discussion seems to have only two alternatives:
   TEI or HyTime and HyTime is a standard which Eliot assures us 
   is able to express TEI comfortably.

I'm sure it is, but will it be understandable by people who want to
implement systems using XML? I know many people with many decades
experience in the text and computing fields who have grave doubts
about getting HyTime understood, whereas the TEI extended pointer
notation is a concrete implementation which can be grasped in half an

I am by no means dismissing HyTime, but I really, badly want to be
convinced that an XML which uses it is going to be comprehensible by
the user and the implementor.

Received on Sunday, 29 December 1996 14:45:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:21 UTC