I will review this once Pat indicates this is the change he is proposing. I suggest we should also ask for feedback from Horrocks and Patel-Schneider (OWL Semantics Editor), cc-ing webont. [Herman does not speak for webont - in particular I note that at the last webont call he was in a minority on a different semantics issue - nothing wrong with that of course. It is conceivable that RDF Core might upset WebOnt by doing what Herman says] I am happy to raise this informally on webont, as part of my review. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 08 January 2004 18:03 > To: Dan Connolly; pat hayes; Herman ter Horst; Eric Miller; Jeremy > Carroll; Sandro Hawke > Cc: rdf core > Subject: revising the semantics PR document > > > It looks like we need to make some minor revisions to the semantics doc. > DanC has asked for a WG decision to approve the change. > > Eric, Sandro, will a decision at a telecon on 16 Jan 2004 be timely from > your point of view? > > I think what we need is a clear description of the proposed changes for > review. Pat, I see a proposal from you at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/th > read.html > > Have you and Herman agreed to this? I see Graham has reviewed it and is > happy with it. > > If anyone has issues with approving this change, please raise them asap. > > Brian > >Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 12:37:58 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 8 January 2004 12:38:00 EST