Re: pfps-04, pfps-06

>Pat,
>
>In his response
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0354.html
>
>pfps suggested for pfps-06 that he just needed told that we'd fixed 
>it.  Can you check whether we have and if so inform him so we can 
>close it off.

I will try to find the first time he was told about this, but it was 
months ago now. Might be simpler just to tell him again?

>
>On pfps-04 - is that fixed or an agree to differ.  pfps again 
>suggested we had not responded.

On this one, Peter and I are in disagreement about what the comment 
was. My view is that the original comment is fixed and that he has 
since transformed it into a new one on which we differ.  Peter's 
view, as I understand it, is that it is not fixed and that we differ.

>
>Would be good to close these off.

By all means. Let us say that the first is closed OK and the second 
is closed agree to differ.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 15:21:04 UTC