W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:08:49 -0500
To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1064938129.2698.578.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 11:01, pat hayes wrote:
> [...]
> >Moreover, I maintain that horn rules is a correct implementation
> >strategy, and I consider anything to the contrary a bug.
> ?? Like, translating into FOL and using resolution is a bug? Or using 
> a tableaux reasoner (like the industrial-strength Manchester OWL 
> reasoners) is a bug? Or using a subgraph-cluster checker for handling 
> very large sets is a bug?  (etc.)  That seems silly.

No, I didn't mean "any other implementation strategy is a bug".
I meant "anything in the semantics document that shows that
implementing with a horn reasoner won't work is a bug".

> I think of the horn rules as a kind of reasoner-erector-set. You can 
> put it together fast, you have the parts pre-built, you don't need a 
> shop, and it even works pretty well; but its not necessarily what a 
> professional would use.  (Which is fine, of course, provided we don't 
> make professionalism illegal.)
> Pat
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 12:08:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:08 UTC