W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought.

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:30:37 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001f07bb8f9b87c648@[10.0.100.9]>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>  > Greetings.
>>
>>  Y'all are going to just LOVE me for this,
>
>Lot's and lots.
>
>(While I personally like that design - it is the wrong time for this
>proposal).

I didnt PROPOSE it.

>Hence I will pick holes:
>
>
>
>
>
>>  aaa ppp "sss"@ttt .
>>  -->>
>>  aaa ppp _:x .
>>  _:x xsd:string "sss" .
>>  _:x rdf:langTag "ttt" .
>>
>>  Note that xsd:string is the appropriate datatype for simple literals,
>>  providing a way to in effect put a simple literal string in the
>>  subject position (encoded as a bnode). In fact, in this design,
>>  xsd:string is in effect owl:sameAs applied to literals.
>
>No that last bit is incorrect - the blank node _:x has language ttt whereas
>the string sss does not.

Right, as Graham also noted, so ignore that remark.

>
>The additional blank node was at the heart of the untidy proposals (either
>explicitly or implicitly) and this proposal is essentially untidiness
>revisited.

Well, the graph is tidy. The plain literals are what they are, and 
the bnodes all denote in the usual way. OK, there can be several 
literal values for the same literal string: but this is just a fact: 
there can be, life is like that.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 13:30:39 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 18 September 2003 13:30:43 EDT