W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

action item update (was Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:27:05 -0400
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030918102705.GD22373@w3.org>

Incorporating notes from the last telecon for inclusion in minutes.

* Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2003-09-11 11:45-0400]

> 6: Confirm Status of Completed or Withdrawn Actions
> 
> ACTION 2002-02-26#11 bwm
>   Consider arrangements for RDF 2 workshop
>   
> ACTION 2003-04-04#5 danbri
>   Editorial action to emphasise in SCHEMA that reification is NOT
>   quotation.
>   
> ACTION 2003-08-29#3 josd
>   to send msg re accuracy of the ' 3 ' test case
>   
> 
> ACTION 2003-08-22#2 danbri
>   to review the proposed rebuttal to I18N objection
>   
> 
> ACTION 2002-06-18#10 bwm
>   start dicussion of CR exit criteria

All Done/completed or withdrawn.
 

> 7: Misc Actions - Status 
> 
> 
> >From Brian's latest action summary, 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0149.html
> 
> ACTION 2002-04-05#2 Aaron
>   complete rdf mime type registration

Cont.

 
> ACTION 2002-06-18#11  bwm
>   consider what the current version link of M&S should point to

Cont.


> 
> ACTION 2002-11-22#3 patH
>   Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out language isn't important to 
> DT entailment  (except for rdf:XMLLiteral)

Cont.


> 
> 
> ACTION 2002-11-22#4 jjc
>   create an example.org DT-entailment showing that language is not relevant.

Done


> 
> 
> ACTION 2002-12-06#10 bwm
>   to ensure rdf and xml FAQs get written completing last deliverable

C(ont.).

> 
> 
> ACTION 2003-01-03#1 bwm
>   check whether to update http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
>   see: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns

C


> 
> ACTION 2003-01-24#14 bwm
>   start draft request to advance to PR

C

> 
> 
> ACTION 2003-01-24#15 em
>   start drafting press release

C

> 
> 
> ACTION 2003-02-07#4 danbri
>   reference the appropriate definition of "triple" in RDFS.

D(one)

> 
> 
> ACTION 2003-03-14#2 bwm
>   (for gk,jjc) Chase EricP's message and get a process resolution for it:
>   see: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0240.html

C

> 
> ACTION 2003-04-11#16 em
>   Request that the documents at the end of the rdf and rdfs ns uris be 
> updated

C

> 
> 
> ACTION 20030711#4 danc
>   to get a test case for pfps-09 into OWL test case doc

C ('in progress')

> 
> 
> ACTION 20030718#4 BWM
>   create postponed issue to revisit support for

(note, description truncated, missing \ ?)

C

> 
> 
> ACTION 20030718#18 DaveB
>   Revise syntax doc to only references to other document status

D

> 
> 
> ACTION 20030815#7 jjc
>   review syntax changes

D

> 
> 
> ACTION 20030815#9 jjc
>   draft implementation report response to i18n objection

C

> 
> ACTION 2003-08-29#1 daveb
>   track down LC comments on wrapper solution for XMLLiteral

D

> 
> 
> ACTION 2003-08-29#6 jang
>   remove xmlsch-02 test cases.

(see discussion under 12: in main minutes)

> 
> ACTION 2003-08-29#1 gk
>   to check with aaron on status of the rdf mimetypes draft

D

> 
> 
> ACTION 2003-08-29#2 danbri
>   to investigation production of script for fixing up internal references

C

> 
> ACTION 2003-08-29#4 jjc
>   to prepare a response to peter on charmod
>   see: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0283.html

? (poor notes, sorry)

 
> ACTION 2003-08-29#5 jjc
>   to respond to peter on %s in URIs
>   see: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0282.html

D
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 06:30:18 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 18 September 2003 06:30:27 EDT