W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Proposed rdf:RDF change

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:13:36 -0400
Message-ID: <3F7DBC50.1000400@acm.org>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Thanks.  That's all I need.

Dave Beckett wrote:

> Frank: since this is critical path for you, here's the change I
> propose to make (on or by Monday):
> 
>   7.2.1. Grammar start
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/#start
> 
> Old:
> 
>   If the RDF/XML is a standalone XML document (identified by
>   presentation as an application/rdf+xml RDF MIME type object, or by
>   some other means) then the grammar starts with Root Event doc.
> 
> New:
>  
>   If the RDF/XML is a standalone XML document (identified by
>   presentation as an application/rdf+xml RDF MIME type object, or by
>   some other means) then the grammar may start with either production
>   doc or production nodeElement.
> 
> ---
> 
> There will then be a new test case something like this:
> 
> <Book xmlns="http://example.org/terms#">
>   <title>My First Primer</title>
> </Book>
> 
> giving the two N-Triples:
> 
> _:a <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://example.org/terms#Book> .
> _:a <http://example.org/terms#title> "My First Primer" .
> 
> (I note my parser Raptor emits the above triples fine if I give it
> the --assume option to make it ignore the rdf:RDF flag; so this is
> pretty much already implemented)
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 13:47:24 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 3 October 2003 13:47:27 EDT