- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:16:07 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > All three tests hold on LC2, and LC1 and the September draft as far as I can > tell now, and also the latest editors draft. The proof hinges on an error in > the wording of the LC1 draft which was fixed about July in the editors draft > but then got changed again by September - I've really no idea why. Is this the "final" situation? That is, that (in particular) that Dave Reynolds's comments on the two test cases http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0129.html can finally be responded to formally - that these cases are in fact valid? I know Dave's probably been closer to the discussion on this than apaprent from the -comments list. Jeremy, could you respond to his message? -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Hang on, wasn't he holding a wooden parrot? No! It was a porcelain owl.
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:16:34 UTC