- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:23:04 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>
>>In the absence of arguments that this change is editorial and not
>>substantive, I ask that the chairs reopen the PR decision, in order
>>to consider the resolution of Herman's last call comments which
>>triggered this change.
>
>As I recall, Pat is travelling in the early part of this week. This
>will hamper clarification of this issue.
>
>The suggestion is that a substantive change, i.e. one visible in a
>test case, has been inadvertently made without consulting the WG.
>If true, that is unfortunate.
My understanding however is that it is not true, and that as I said,
no test cases are affected.
Full disclosure: there is a case which COULD have been a test case
but isn't, which would have been affected if had been a test case,
which is
{ } entails { _:x rdf:type rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty .}
which is not an valid LC2-entailment. That is, the current semantics
requires that some containermembership properties must exist, even if
nobody talks about them.
Pat
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell
phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 12:23:05 UTC