W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: webont-01 'rename schema' proposal

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:20:45 -0500
Message-Id: <p05210608baf986f75734@[]>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>[I was unable to read danbri's original message... but responding to 
>the quoted version here]
>schema n. (pl. schemata // or schemas)
>1 a synopsis, outline, or diagram.
>2 a proposed arrangement.
>3 Logic a syllogistic figure.
>4 (in Kantian philosophy) a conception of what is common to all 
>members of a class; a general type or essential form.
>[Greek skhema -atos ‘form, figure’]
>-- the Concise Oxford Dictionary
>"schema" is, to my mind, a perfectly respectable generic term.  I 
>don't think that because it's used in the phrase "XML schema" we 
>should be bullied out of deploying the equally reasonable term "RDF 

Right on. I absolutely agree.  That word already had about ten 
technical meanings before XML was even thought of.


IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:21:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:05 UTC