W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: webont-01 'rename schema' proposal

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:20:45 -0500
Message-Id: <p05210608baf986f75734@[10.0.100.24]>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>[I was unable to read danbri's original message... but responding to 
>the quoted version here]
>
>[[
>schema n. (pl. schemata // or schemas)
>1 a synopsis, outline, or diagram.
>2 a proposed arrangement.
>3 Logic a syllogistic figure.
>4 (in Kantian philosophy) a conception of what is common to all 
>members of a class; a general type or essential form.
>[Greek skhema -atos ‘form, figure’]
>]]
>-- the Concise Oxford Dictionary
>
>"schema" is, to my mind, a perfectly respectable generic term.  I 
>don't think that because it's used in the phrase "XML schema" we 
>should be bullied out of deploying the equally reasonable term "RDF 
>schema".

Right on. I absolutely agree.  That word already had about ten 
technical meanings before XML was even thought of.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:21:10 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:34 EDT