- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 15 May 2003 12:57:27 -0500
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 11:13, Frank Manola wrote: > It's all very well for Internet Drafts to expire after 6 months, but > that doesn't mean the links have to expire too. It would be more > helpful to resolve to "the Internet Draft you're looking for has > expired, and if you want to read the old text anyway, go here" than to > "we don't know what you're talking about". IETF, of all people! Your point is well made (and frequently made, in my experience), but this forum has no mandate to do anything about it. There is an IETF/W3C coordination forum where your point would be in order: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:58:14 UTC