W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Change in definition of RDF literals

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:11:30 +0300
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200305141511.30039.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



> Are you then presuming that the lexical form in the graph is
> canonicalized?

That was the reagle-01 and reagle-02 issues.
We had some call to simplify the model, and we have done so; noting that 
implementors may do exactly as you suggest.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:11:22 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: open concepts issues - proposals for xmlsch-05 and xsmlsch-06"
Previous message: Jeremy Carroll: "Re: open concepts issues - proposals for xmlsch-05 and xsmlsch-06"
Maybe in reply to: Jeremy Carroll: "Change in definition of RDF literals"
Next in thread: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com: "RE: Change in definition of RDF literals"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:30 EDT