At 19:50 09/05/2003 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: [...] >I think the matter of working with things described by "in-the-wild" RDF >is crucial here: > >- if the scope of OWL-DL/lite restrictions is to the actual OWL >descriptions that are used to describe things, then it seems OK. > >- if, on the other hand, the restrictions apply to any RDF about the >things thus described, I think there's a problem. I believe its the latter. BrianReceived on Friday, 9 May 2003 21:47:31 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:30 EDT