RE: typed literals and language tags - two proposals

• From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
• Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:34:00 +0300
• To: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
• Cc: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B01B90DA0@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>

> Option 4 (langauge tags go for all typed literals) does make 
> it, at least 
> odd, using RDF with embedded xhtml, which I have always 
> thought of as a 
> major use case. But Dave's right to point out that it is 
> quite tidy. 

Also remember that this is about the RDF intepretation of
the RDF/XML instance, not the XML interpretation of the
RDF/XML instance, so I think we're on very solid ground
for ignoring the significance of any xml:lang attribute
insofar as the semantics of the XML literal is concerned.

Patrick

Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 05:41:22 UTC