Re: Suggestion williams-02 - *huge* editorial change

Jeremy,

Remembering DanC's advice from a short time ago, the point of last call is 
identify issues that folks can't live with.  If you are going to propose 
even discussion of a *huge* change, perhaps you might care to suggest why a 
huge change is necessary.

Brian

At 11:19 27/03/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Williams-02 is the suggestion that we should:
>- defer to Namespaces 1.1 for the definition of IRI
>- and globally substitute "[RDF] URI Reference"  by "IRI"
>
>There is a small substantive differences which is Unicode Normal Form C.
>On the advice of I18N WG in Cannes we required RDF URI References to be in
>Unicode NFC; Martin Dürst informs me that they have changed their minds on
>this one.
>
>Draft proposal:
>
>Change concepts to defer to Namespaces 1.1 defn of IRI rather than have a
>definition of RDF URI reference.
>
>Globally substitute "[RDF] URI Reference", "uriref" etc.  by "IRI".
>
>
>This needs discussion!
>
>Also, we should e-mail i18n-ig and ask for an official comment from the wg
>retracting their advice in Cannes.
>
>Jeremy