W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion).

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:20:32 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b08ba97bfb9c3c8@[10.0.100.86]>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>This smells like a contradiction to me...
>
>At 17:17 11/03/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>>ex:Mary ex:had ex:littleLamb .
>>
>>a girl or a uriref  (respectively de dicto or de re)  ?
>
>this seems to say the use of ex:Mary in a reification is:
>   a girl is the 'de dicto' view?
>   a uri is the 'de re' view?

No, sorry, I got it backwards. Mary is de re, 'ex:Mary' is de dicto.

Pat

>but later...
>
>>These two choices are independent, but each influences the 
>>significance of the other.
>>
>>Currently, the semantics document recommends that one should 
>>interpret this vocabulary so that aaa is interpreted as a stating, 
>>ie referring to a concrete occurrence of a triple rather than an 
>>abstract form; and that bbb should be interpreted de re, ie as 
>>referring to Mary rather than to Mary's URIref.
>
>... 'de re' refers to Mary, so (by assumed elimination) 'de dicto' 
>refers to the uri.
>
>Am I missing something here?
>
>#g
>
>
>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>
>PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 12:20:16 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:14 EDT