I propose we accept the recommendation from the group meeting at W3C tech plenary: [[ The Semantic Web Architecture meeting at the W3C tech plenary resolved unanimously to this message. We suggest that: - section 4 is struck - postpone rdfms-assertion - strike other text concerning rdfms-assertion - CG prioritise work on this issue, co-ordinated with the TAG over URI denotation. ]] -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0486.html <aside> Absent from the meeting, I'd like to thank Jeremy for taking the hot-seat, and everyone who spent effort to bring the relevant issues to the fore. I think it is particularly appropriate that this issue be dealt with by SWebCG or TAG, clearly separated from the RDF *technical* specification, but indicating a sense of the purpose of RDF (whatever that may be ;-) </aside> #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5EReceived on Friday, 7 March 2003 05:34:03 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:11 EDT